
						share: 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/submit?url=http://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/Summary-Box-Dutch-court-won-t-ban-iPhone-iPad-2218734.php&amp;title=Summary+Box%3A+Dutch+court+won%27t+ban+iPhone%2C+iPad&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;digg&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/Summary-Box-Dutch-court-won-t-ban-iPhone-iPad-2218734.php&amp;t=Summary+Box%3A+Dutch+court+won%27t+ban+iPhone%2C+iPad&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;facebook&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/Summary-Box-Dutch-court-won-t-ban-iPhone-iPad-2218734.php&quot;&gt;twitter&lt;/a&gt;						 A DEFEAT: A Dutch court refused Friday to grant Samsung an injunction banning Apple from selling iPhones and iPad tablets in the Netherlands.
SAMSUNG&#039;S POSITION: Samsung argued that Apple needs licenses to sell such devices because they use 3G mobile technology patented by Samsung.
THE RULING: The court said that because the 3G technology has been accepted as an industry standard, Samsung is obliged to offer Apple licenses under &quot;fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory&quot; terms. The court said the licensing fee Samsung sought from Apple &quot;was so far out of step&quot; with its obligations under those terms. 
					